How to Be Creative in a Culture of Anger (Summer Arts Week 4)
Isaiah 2:1-5
Luke 22:47-53
Let’s look first at the images in your printed liturgy. There are three photographs by Gordon Parks:
Emerging Man (1952), The Fontanelles at the Poverty Board (1967), and Black
Children and White Doll (1942).
What do you see? What
do you notice? What do you feel?
Gordon once said that his goal as a photographer was to have
you the viewer thinking about the image, about reality, and not about him the
photographer. Did he succeed on that
score?
One of his famous early photographs was “American Gothic.” It’s an African American cleaning woman, Ella
Watson, standing in front of an American Flag, holding a mop and a broom. She is posed – and the image is titled – in a
way that parodies a previous American Gothic painting of simple, white,
midwestern farmers. Parks said later
that the image was angry, was too much about his anger, too much about
him. When you see it you might think,
this is a photographer with an angry viewpoint. And if you think that, you can
dismiss him, and the problems of racism woven through the photograph.
But you cannot dismiss the Fontanelles. They are there. And you cannot dismiss the children with the
doll. They are not posing. They are just sitting against a wall, at
home. This is reality. This is the world we live in.
Is art valuable? Is
creativity valuable? These are hard
questions to answer. I think many of us
reflexively think, “Not really. I mean,
they’re nice luxuries. But they’re not
really at the white hot center of life.
They’re ornamental, window dressing, nice if you have the time and
leisure for them.”
It might seem like the times we’re in don’t really have room
for art, for creativity, for beauty, and for large, slow-moving, deeply
considered images and ideas. After all,
the economy is bad. Good jobs are hard
to come by. The middle class is
shrinking. Europe is falling apart. The stock market tumbled last week. We can’t agree on terrorist threats and gun
legislation. And we’re in the middle of
an election cycle. Is this really any
time to doodle and draw, plant flowers or start a business, sculpt or write
poetry?
In this economy, in this political climate, in this social
media culture – it’s tough to be a kind person, a courageous person, a
peace-loving person. All of us wrestle
with feelings of anger and fear. And I
would argue that it is precisely at this moment that we are starved for more
art, more creativity, more making, more imagination, more innovative problem
solving.
If you haven’t read Gordon Parks’ autobiography, A Choice of Weapons, I highly recommend
it. Parks was born and raised here in
Fort Scott. It was a terrible, hateful,
degrading time to be black. His mother died
when he was sixteen and he went to live with his older sister in St. Paul. Her husband was abusive and violent and
kicked Gordon out of the house. So
Gordon was homeless, sometimes without work, often starving, frequently
desperate and despairing.
When Parks’ luck ran out in the Minneaplis/St. Paul area, he
jumped a train to Chicago. He almost
froze to death on the way. He got
downtown and found a dirty flophouse called the Hotel Southland on Wabash
Avenue. Rooms were twenty five cents a
night. He asked for a room. They told him to go to the colored section on
the South Side of the city. He said he’d
work, so the manager gave him a room.
Here’s how Parks describes the place . . . (p. 66, 68). It was a building full of cramped cages for
various kinds of criminals and the mentally ill.
One night a man ran past Parks on the stairs. Police were chasing him. He’d been involved in a robbery. They found him hiding under Parks’ bed. . . . (p. 72). He left his gun under the bed. And Parks found it three weeks later.
One Saturday, when Parks went to collect his pay, Big John –
who ran the place – was drunk. He
refused to pay, referred to him in racist terms, beat him and threatened to
kill him. Parks went upstairs to gather
his things to leave. And he found the
gun. He went back downstairs and pointed
the gun at Big John and demanded his pay.
He was ready to shoot but didn’t have to. He left there, hurried across the river
bridge, and when no one was looking, pitched the gun into the river.
Later Parks found work as a waiter on the North Coast
Limited train that ran between Minneapolis and Chicago. He had heard about a nasty Southerner named
Barnes who was a head steward. Most
African Americans switched crews rather than have to work for Barnes. Parks thought he could handle it. Parks would stay up late in the dining car
reading, and Barnes would turn the light off, calling him an “uppity
nigra”. Parks turned the lights back
on. Barnes retaliated in every way he
could, piling extra work on Parks. One
night, Barnes pushed Parks’ arm and made him spill four bowls of hot soup on a
passenger and himself.
Parks writes, “I forgot that it was winter, that I had a
family and needed a job. I shoved Barnes
into the pantry, snatched up a bread knife and held it against his
throat.” The other waiters pulled them
apart.
These kinds of experiences cultivated a deep growing anger
in Parks, understandably. . . . (p. 95a, p. 127).
But there was another way opening to Parks. When working on the train, he found magazines
filled with powerful images of migrant workers.
They were pictures taken by photographers working for the Farm Security
Administration. Then on a layover, he
wandered into the Chicago Art Institute and saw images of poverty and migrant
workers taken by photographers working for the FSA. And it was then that Gordon realized the power
of images. He bought a camera and taught
himself how to take pictures.
Rather than fight with knives and guns and fists and hateful
words, Gordon determined to shine a light on poverty and racism by taking
photographs. Images could show, better
than anything else, the beauty and dignity of all people. He learned how to be creative in an angry
world. Hateful retaliation would have
destroyed others and himself. But to
make pictures – that would enable a kind of healing newness to emerge in a
troubled time.
The readings today imagine a way of life beyond revenge and
retaliation. Those things happen,
obviously. The world is a violent place. We have all been caught up in it. The question is whether we are full
participants in the revenge, retaliation, violence and anger around us, of
whether can begin to live to a new tune.
There is music playing – God’s music – and it is often faint. You have to want to hear it. But the music is for those who want to share
in the new world of peacemaking, justice, and compassion that God is building
amidst the old world of competition and success at all costs.
The readings ask us if we want something more creative and
fulfilling than a life of revenge and retaliation. They ask us to imagine a life that exchanges
anger, fear, and hatred for beauty, justice, friendship, cooperation, and
forgiveness. Here’s the hard truth of
the good news: no one else is going to stop the flow of mean-spirited talk and
hateful actions. It has to stop in
you. And it has to stop in me. What I mean is – the only “solution” – if
it’s a solution at all – is to open ourselves to the work of God in the depths
of our lives so that we can create a different kind of life. Now whether this will add up to something
larger – I guess that’s up to God and this thing we call “God’s kingdom.”
And so make something.
Make a friendship. Make a
meal. Make a garden or flower bed. Make a diary or journal. Make a business or a side-project. Make a quilt or a table. Let your energy flow clean and fresh,
purified from the anger and fear that drive so much of what we do. Let your natural energies craft something new
in the world.
The readings are not about personal piety. They do not pare down God’s dreams for the
world to something like the flimsy little frame of your life or mine. God’s dreams are for reconciliation, healing,
and blessing between all peoples of the world.
It is a very political dream. It
is a public, visible dream. And so we
cannot let ourselves off the hook by saying that we personally aren’t harming
others. We have a voice. We have minds and imaginations. We have an allegiance to Jesus’ way of life. We have commitments to non-violence in a
violent world. Don’t think for a minute
that non-violence was easy for Jesus, or for the early followers of Jesus who
wrote the gospels. They urged the
non-violent way of peaceful resistance in a climate shot through with hatred,
violence, and fear. At the tip of the
spear, they didn’t blink. They stuck to
peacemaking when the costs were high. We
have to do the same now.
Both passages imagine creative responses to God’s work in
the world. Making ploughshares is
creative work. And it signals even more
creative work – tilling and cultivating a field. Jesus’ healing of the man’s ear is creative
work. Violence always cuts off and cuts
away. Healing always mends and puts back
together.
Both readings suggest a larger image – God’s new community
of friends as a creative work. So –
don’t miss this – being part of a congregation is creative. By being here, by belonging here, you are
part of something fundamentally creative.
You have bet your life that a community of friends following Jesus
Christ is a powerful, healing, blessing thing.
You are contributing your life and voice and skills to an ongoing,
risky, courageous project.
Your generosity, prayer and support makes possible this
always moving work of art we call church.
It is all about beauty and blessing, not hatred and retaliation. It is all about creating friendships and
connections, not naming and excluding enemies.
It is all about the ferociously creative task of gathering up our messy,
disordered lives and offering them to each other, and to God, in the hopes that
something kind and compassionate can be made of them. Come Holy Spirit, and make something beautiful
in us and between us. Amen.
Comments
Post a Comment